Breaking Down the Language of Online Racism: A Comparison of the Psychological Dimensions of Communication in Racist, Anti-Racist, and Non-Activist Groups
Corresponding Author
Ana-Maria Bliuc
Western Sydney University
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Ana-Maria Bliuc, Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. [e-mail: [email protected]].Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ana-Maria Bliuc
Western Sydney University
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Ana-Maria Bliuc, Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. [e-mail: [email protected]].Search for more papers by this authorWe are grateful to the Australian Research Council, Australian Human Rights Commision, and the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation for supporting this research through funding for the ARC LP 120200115 “Cyber-racism and community resilience.”
Abstract
The Internet represents a powerful tool for racist groups to build a sense of group consciousness and promote their cause. In the current study, we examined the language used by racist (n = 87), anti-racist (n = 50), and nonactivist (n = 1379) groups when describing their self-defining beliefs online. We used computerized linguistic analysis software to measure psychological indicators and antecedents of group consciousness and to examine the persuasive techniques used in online group communication. Racist and anti-racist groups were similar on some linguistic indicators of group consciousness (e.g., use of words reflecting perceived injustice), but differed on others (e.g., use of words reflecting group identification). Linguistic indicators of antecedents of group consciousness (moral foundations and focus on religion) differed across groups, with racist groups focused more on purity, respect for authority, and religion, and less on fairness than anti-racist groups. Racist groups also used less cognitively complex language than nonactivist groups (but similar levels to anti-racist groups). Our results contribute to understanding how racist groups promote their self-defining beliefs online, and identify several key factors that should be considered when designing policies to reduce racist groups’ growth and impact.
References
- Adams, J., & Roscigno, V. J. (2005). White supremacists, oppositional culture and the world wide web. Social Forces, 84, 759–778. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0001
- Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939–954. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.939
- Anti-Defamation League (2001). Poisoning the web: Hatred online: Internet bigotry, extremism and violence. Retrieved from http://archive.adl.org/poisoning_web/net_hate_tool.html
- Atton, C. (2006). Far-right media on the Internet: Culture, discourse and power. New Media and Society, 8, 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806065653
- Bantum, E. O., & Owen, J. E. (2009). Evaluating the validity of computerized content analysis programs for identification of emotional expression in cancer narratives. Psychological Assessment, 21, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014643
- Barkun, M. (1997). Religion and the racist right: The origins of the christian identity movement. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/101.1.152
- Bliuc, A. M., Best, D., Beckwith, M., & Iqbal, M. (2016). Online support communities in addiction recovery. In S. Buckinham & D. Best (Eds.), Addiction, behavioral change and social identity: The path to resilience and recovery (p. 137). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2017.1347258
- Bliuc, A. M., Best, D., Iqbal, M., & Upton, K. (2017). Building addiction recovery capital through online participation in a recovery community. Social Science & Medicine, 193, 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.050
- Bliuc, A. M., McGarty, C., Badea, C., & Boza, M. (2018). Enacting collective support for the European integration: Participation in pro-integration action and preference for specific transnational acculturation strategies. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 28, 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2337
- Bliuc, A. M., McGarty, C., Hartley, L., & Muntele Hendres, D. (2012). Manipulating national identity: The strategic use of rhetoric by supporters and opponents of the ‘Cronulla riots’ in Australia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35, 2174–2194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2011.600768
- Bliuc, A. M., McGarty, C., Reynolds, K., & Muntele, D. (2007). Opinion-based group membership as a predictor of commitment to political action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.334
- Bliuc, A. M., McGarty, C., Thomas, E. F., Lala, G., Berndsen, M., & Misajon, R. (2015). Public division about climate change rooted in conflicting socio-political identities. Nature Climate Change, 5, 226–229. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2507
- Billig, M. (2001). Humour and hatred: The racist jokes of the Ku Klux Klan. Discourse and Society 12, 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012003001
- Burris, V., Smith E., & Strahm A. (2000). White supremacist networks on the internet. Sociological Focus, 33, 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2000.10571166
10.1080/00380237.2000.10571166 Google Scholar
- Caiani, M., & Parenti, L. (2010). The dark side of the web: Italian right-wing extremist groups and the Internet. Southern European Society and Politics, 14, 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608740903342491
- Chau, M., & Xu, J. (2006). Mining communities and their relationships in blogs: A study of online hate groups. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.08.009
- Clifford, S., & Jerit, J. (2013). How words do the work of politics: Moral foundations theory and the debate over stem cell research. The Journal of Politics, 75, 659–671. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381613000492
- Cohn, M. A., Mehl, M. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2004). Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychological Science, 15, 687–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00741.x
- Daniels, J. (2009). Cloaked websites: Propaganda, cyber-racism and epistemology in the digital era. New Media & Society, 11, 659–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809105345
- Daniels, J. (2013). Race and racism in Internet studies: A review and critique. New Media & Society, 15, 695–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462849
- Davis, D., & Brock, T. C. (1975). Use of first person pronouns as a function of increased objective self-awareness and performance feedback. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(75)90017-7
- Delacre, M., Lakens, D., Mora, Y., & Leys, C. (2018, January 31). Why psychologists should always report the W-test instead of the F-test ANOVA. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.82
10.5334/irsp.82 Google Scholar
- Dobratz, B. A. (2001). The role of religion in the collective identity of the white racialist movement. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/0021-8294.00056
- Douglas, K. M., McGarty, C. A., Bliuc, A.-M., & Lala, G. (2005). Understanding cyberhate: Social competition and social creativity in online white supremacist groups. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439304271538
- Duncan, L. E. (2012). The psychology of collective action. In K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 781–803). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398991.013.0031
- Erjavec, K. & Kovacic, M. P. (2012). ‘You don't understand, this is a new war!’ Analysis of hate speech in news websites’ comments. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 899–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.619679
- Faulkner, N., & Bliuc, A.-M. (2016). ‘It's okay to be racist’: Moral disengagement in online discussions of racist incidents in Australia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39, 2545–2563. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2016.1171370
- Franklin, R. A. (2010). The hate directory. Retrieved from http://www.hatedirectory.com
- Gerstenfeld, P. B., Grant, D. R., & Chiang, C. P. (2003). Hate online: A content analysis of extremist internet sites. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 3, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2003.00013.x
10.1111/j.1530-2415.2003.00013.x Google Scholar
- Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
- Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
- Guerin, B. (2003a). Combating prejudice and racism: New interventions from a functional analysis of racist language. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.699
- Guerin, B. (2003b). Language use as social strategy: A review and an analytic framework for the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 7, 251–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.3.251
- Gunsch, M. A., Brownlow, S., Haynes, S. E., & Mabe, Z. (2000). Differential linguistic content of various forms of political advertising. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4401_3
- Hafer, C. L., Reynolds, K. L., & Obertynski, M. A. (1996). Message comprehensibility and persuasion: Effects of complex language in counter-attitudinal appeals to laypeople. Social Cognition, 14, 317–337. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1996.14.4.317
- Hale, W. C. (2012). Extremism on the World Wide Web: A research review. Criminal Justice Studies, 25, 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601x.2012.704723
10.1080/1478601X.2012.704723 Google Scholar
- Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651
- Hamm, M. S. (1993). American skinheads: The criminology and control of hate crime. Westport, CT: Praeger.
- Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Hodson, G., & Busseri, M. A. (2012). Bright minds and dark attitudes: Lower cognitive ability predicts greater prejudice through right-wing ideology and low intergroup contact. Psychological Science, 23, 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611421206
- Kacewicz, E., Pennebaker, J. W., Davis, M., Jeon, M., & Graesser, A. C. (2014). Pronoun use reflects standings in social hierarchies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x13502654
- Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP16-026. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2818659
10.2139/ssrn.2818659 Google Scholar
- Lee, E., & Leets, L. (2002). Persuasive storytelling by hate groups online: Examining its effects on adolescents. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 927–957. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764202045006003
- Lowrey, T. M. (1998). The effects of syntactic complexity on advertising persuasiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7, 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_04
10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_04 Google Scholar
- McNamee G., Peterson, B. L., & Pena, J. (2010). A call to educate, participate, invoke and indict: Understanding the communication of online hate groups. Communication Monographs, 77, 257–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751003758227
- Mission Statements. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.missionstatements.com
- Multicultural Australia (n.d.). List of anti-racist groups. Retrieved from http://www.multiculturalaustralia.edu.au/doc/antiracist_1.pdf
- Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., Boyd, R. L., & Francis, M.E. (2015a). Linguistic inquiry and word Count: LIWC2015. Austin, TX: Pennebaker Conglomerates.
- Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015b). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.
- Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Frazee, J., Lavergne, G. M., & Beaver, D. I. (2014). When small words foretell academic success: The case of college admissions essays. PloS one, 9, e115844. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115844
- Pennebaker, J. W., & Francis, M. E. (1996). Cognitive, emotional, and language processes in disclosure. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999396380079
- Pennebaker, J. W., & King, L. A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1296–1312. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1296
- Pennebaker, J. W., Mayne, T. J., & Francis, M. E. (1997). Linguistic predictors of adaptive bereavement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 863–871. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.72.4.863
- Sidanius, J. (1978). Intolerance of ambiguity and socio-politico ideology: A multidimensional analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420080207
- Sillars, A., Shellen, W., McIntosh, A., & Pomegranate, M. (1997). Relational characteristics of language: Elaboration and differentiation in marital conversations. Western Journal of Communication, 61, 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319709374587
- Simi, P., & Futrell, R. (2006). Cyberculture and the endurance of white power activism. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 34, 115–142.
- Slatcher, R. B., Chung, C. K., Pennebaker, J. W., & Stone, L.D. (2007). Winning words: Individual differences in linguistic style among U.S. presidential and vice presidential candidates. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/e529412014-119
- SPLC. (2016). Intelligence files. Retrieved from http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files
- Tam, K.P., Au, A., & Leung, A.K.Y. (2008). Attributionally more complex people show less punitiveness and racism. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1074–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.11.002
- Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x09351676
- Tynes, B. M., Reynolds, L., & Greenfield, P.M. (2004). Adolescence, race and ethnicity on the internet: A comparison of discourse in monitored vs. unmonitored chat rooms. Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2004.09.003
- Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological bulletin, 134(4), http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
- von Hippel, W., Sekaquaptewa, D., & Vargas, P.T. (2009). Linguistic markers of implicit attitudes. In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio, & P. Brinol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from new implicit measures. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Weaver, S. (2012). A rhetorical discourse analysis of online anti-Muslim and anti-Semitic jokes. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36, 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.734386
- White, F. A., Abu-Rayya, H. M., Bliuc, A. M., & Faulkner, N. (2015). Emotion expression and intergroup bias reduction between Muslims and Christians: Long-term Internet contact. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.074
- Wikipedia (2014). Category:Anti-racist organizations in the United States. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Anti-racist_organizations_in_the_United_States